When Big Carnivores Go Down, Even Vegetarians Take The Hit

Ask not for whom the wolf stalks ... (늑대가 무엇을 쫓고 있는지 묻지 마세용...)

 

When Big Carnivores Go Down, Even Vegetarians Take The Hit
(맹수가 줄면, 초식동물도 타격을 입는다.)

 

A drop in the numbers of fierce beasts worldwide might seem good news for deer and antelope — at first. But expanding herds of grass-eaters leave streambanks naked and vulnerable to erosion, and can even change the stream's course, according to scientists calling for more protection of large predators.

 

(맹수들의 수가 전세계적으로 줄어드는 것이 사슴과 영양에게는 좋은 소식일지 모른다 -- 처음에는. 그러나 초식동물의 수가 늘어나면서 강둑의 풀들이 사라지고 강둑이 침식되는데, 이것이 심지어는 강의 흐름을 바꾸기도 한다 : 맹수들을 더 많이 보호해야 한다고 주장하는 과학자들의 말)  말 되네요 ㅋㅋ

 

 

Big, fierce animals — lions and tigers and bears, for example — are relatively scarce in nature. That's normal, because if you have too many, they'll eat themselves out of prey.


But top predators are now so rare that many are in danger of disappearing. That's creating ripple effects throughout the natural world that scientists are still trying to figure out.


What they're exploring is ecology — the interplay of animals and plants in nature. It's not rocket science. It's harder.


"We're dealing with the most complicated systems in the universe, and we hardly even know what the moving parts are," says Rolf Peterson, a research ecologist at Michigan Tech.


Peterson studies large carnivores, and is among the world's top wolf experts. He and scientists like him are finding that as the number of big predators dwindles, everything around the animals changes. It's like a "cascade" down the food chain. Ecologists call it a trophic cascade — trophic being a term to define any particular level in nature's food chain.


Take cougars and wolves for example. When there are fewer of them, their prey — deer and elk, mostly — multiply. More plant eaters means more plants get eaten. And everything that depends on those plants, from birds to butterflies, is affected.


Carnivore biologist William Ripple, from Oregon State University, says even streams are affected. Armies of deer, grown out of control because of a lack of predators that eat them, can devour all the vegetation along streambanks, and that causes erosion along those banks.


"The stream actually changes course," says Ripple. "So we're finding that the predator can actually affect the shape of the stream."

 
Decaying leftovers from this Alaskan brown bear's meal add helpful nutrients to the soil.
SteveClever/iStockphoto These cascade effects take all sorts of paths. Bears, for example, grab salmon out of rivers and eat them on the banks; the leftovers decay and add nutrients to the soil that help plants grow. "It's just a type of connecting-the-dots in nature," says Ripple. "And it shows the inter-connectedness."


Ripple and other "carnivorists" published a study in this week's issue of the journal Science that lists the benefits that predators provide. They note that in places where predators are reintroduced (such as in Yellowstone National Park), deer and elk – and vegetation — return to a more natural state.


That may seem obvious. But Peterson says the chain of so-called "carnivore benefits" is not well known, even as big carnivores disappear. "You know, we have trashed the large carnivores for sure," he says. "They are becoming more and more scarce, and we don't even have the science to tell us what we're losing."


What remain are scientific questions such as, "How many wolves or cougars or grizzlies do you need in, say, a national park to keep the other animals and plants under control?"


Peterson says the wolf has been an especially difficult case. It's made a comeback in the U.S. and Canada, but wolves sometimes prey on livestock. They compete with hunters for deer and elk. Many people have a deep-seated fear of them. Several states now allow the hunting of wolves in places where their numbers seem adequate. That's created enmity — with hunters and ranchers on one side and some environmentalists on the other.


Peterson says people have always had a love-hate relationship with wolves, having bred them into "man's best friend," the dog, while at the same time demonizing them in myth, and hunting them to near extinction.


"How do we live with these creatures and how will we accommodate them?" Peterson asks. "And what will stop their increase when we put them back? We are in the driver's seat."


Scientists are now calling for a global Large Carnivore Initiative to organize research on carnivore ecology and, as Peterson points out, to illustrate just how predators have shaped our world. "It was the large carnivores to a great extent that maintained that fabric of life that formed us," he says. The world wouldn't be what it is without them.

 

 

출처:

http://www.npr.org/2014/01/10/261120968/when-big-carnivores-go-down-even-vegetarians-take-the-hit


 

설정

트랙백

댓글

*괄호 속의 한글은 제가 이 철자들을 외우는, 아주 유치하지만 효과 만점인 방법 ㅋㅋ


1.
Misspell: seperate
Correct: separate (세파라테)


2.
Misspell: definate
Correct: definite (데피니테)


3.
Misspell: calender
Correct: calendar (칼렌다르)


4.
Misspell: mispell
Correct: misspell (mis + spell)


5.
Misspell: privlege
Correct: privilege (프빌레게)


6.
Misspell: arguement
Correct: argument (아르멘트)


7.
Misspell: concensus
Correct: consensus (콘센스) * sensus=sense(감각,느낌,기분)

8.
Misspell: pronounciation
Correct: pronunciation (프로시아티온)


9.
Misspell: accomodate
Correct: accommodate (아코다테)


10.
Misspell: dependant
Correct: dependent (데펜덴트) *defendant : 피고

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

BE YOURSELF! 

 

I am always between my lowest and highest self.
My goal is to achieve one of them or one of those in between.
So my goal is always accomplished and never accomplished at the same time.
Although I can always reach my lowest self, I can never reach my highest self.
I am always happy, not only because I have always accomplished my lowest self but also because I have my highest self that I will never be able to reach: my unperishable goal.
The point is : I am always happy, this way or that way.

 

Brian Choi

 

설정

트랙백

댓글