설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

Authorities say they've broken up a terror plot targeting a U.S. financial institution. Political opinions strain some friendships on social media. Airline passengers turn into search-and-rescue spotters to help a stranded sailor. Get the details on all of these stories in Friday's program. Plus, we compare plans to lower the U.S. deficit, and we examine an increase in U.S. student loan debt.

설정

트랙백

댓글

 


(CNN) -- Mitt Romney showed up Tuesday night talking about "binders full of women" being brought to him when he was governor. Sounds kind of kinky and certainly not something you want to be touting.

The phrase was part of Romney's answer to a question from an audience member at the second presidential debate about how he would "rectify the inequalities in the workplace." Referring to when he took over as Massachusetts governor, he said, "I had the chance to pull together a Cabinet, and all the applicants seemed to be men," he said. "I went to a number of women's groups and said, 'Can you help us find folks?' and they brought us whole binders full of women."

The "binders" moment went viral immediately on Twitter, spawning @RomneysBinders and @womaninabinder Twitter handles. As of Wednesday morning, almost 300,000 people had supported a Facebook page about what a politically dumb statement it was. Romney may soon say it was "inelegant" phrasing or he didn't finish his statement or some other excuse, but the comment shows why voters, especially women, don't trust him and don't believe he has their back.

CNN Money: Bindersfullofwomen.com snapped up in 90 seconds

 
Maria Cardona : In fairness, "binders" was most likely a slip of the tongue. But Romney said it in an effort to obfuscate and pivot from the issue at hand: equality for women. He avoided the real question, and that, and his remark, spoke volumes.

Even as a slip of the tongue, this odd phrase betrays Romney's true lack of understanding, knowledge and comfort level on women's equality. And besides the binders comment, there are several problems with the story Romney told Tuesday night.


First of all, it is not true. The "binder" of women's résumés was prepared before the election by the Massachusetts Government Appointments Project, a coalition of nonpartisan women's groups. When Romney won, the women -- not in binders -- gave him the résumés.


Source: CNNRomney wasn't behind 'binders of women' Romney told that story in an effort to demonstrate how well his administration had done in hiring women. Except it didn't. A study by the University of Massachusetts and the Center for Women in Politics and Public Policy shows that the percentage of women in senior positions during his tenure actually declined. It went from 30% when Romney took office to 27% when he left and up to more than 33% after the new governor took over.

Did Romney undo gains with women?

Also, it boggles the mind that throughout his decades-long career in business, Romney had not come across any qualified women he could appoint to his Cabinet. The Romney campaign points to longtime aide Beth Myers, but she was not in the Cabinet.

The more reasonable explanation is that diversity of gender, or any kind of diversity, was never an important tenet of corporate leadership for Romney. Which is why he did not proactively seek out the "binders full of women": Women's groups, in fact, came looking for him.

All of this goes to the heart of why Romney has had such a hard time winning over the women's vote. He answered the audience member's question from the standpoint of a detached CEO who knew that he had to find qualified women to serve in his administration come hell or high water, given the vast disparity between men and women holding management positions. He must have known he would be blasted if he didn't do it. In this day and age, this should be a no-brainer. You should not ask the American people to give you a medal for hiring qualified women.

The dissonance when it comes to the governor and women went even further at the debate. Romney not only couldn't answer the question about women' equality, he could not even answer a question about outlawing AK-47s without bringing up single mothers. Saying he did not believe in changing gun laws, he seemed to equate children raised by single parents with the "culture of violence." I may be wrong, but I don't think that is a good strategy to get struggling single moms to vote for you.

Tech: Social world thumbs through 'binders full of women'

President Obama, in contrast, answered the equality question not just from a personal standpoint as a father but also as a commander in chief who signed a bill into law that guaranteed women could receive equal pay for equal work, the Lilly Ledbetter Act. Romney conspicuously never said whether he supported that act. The president's approach was much more in synch with what women want to hear and with what all Americans know to be fair.

The binders comment was even more unfortunate for Romney in that he said it in the midst of Obama's very strong showing. The president clearly showed that he had the fight, the passion and the commitment to continue to work for middle-class voters -- on jobs, on health care, on taxes, on education, on immigration and, yes, on women's issues.

This all underscores Romney's inability to really connect with voters. Although he seemed to win a little more favor among women after the first debate, I predict binders of polling data as to why that movement stopped after Tuesday night.

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

S.Korea Wins UN Security Council Seat

South Korea was on Wednesday elected as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council for the first time in 15 years. It was one of the three candidates from Asia along with Bhutan and Cambodia.
The country won support from 149 nations in the second round of voting, more than two-thirds of the 193 members, to secure the one available seat for the Asia-Pacific region. The term starts in 2013 and lasts two years.
Since joining the UN in 1991, South Korea served as a non-permanent member of the Security Council once already, from 1996 to 1997. Its second term will allow it to influence crucial international security issues.
The mandate includes the right to call for a meeting of the council, boosting stability in tense times on the Korean Peninsula. The South Korean government hopes to play a major role in issues such as North Korea's nuclear program and the environment.

 

 

SEOUL, Oct. 19 — South Korea’s status as a non- permanent member of the United Nations Security Council will help deter future provocations by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), the country’s top diplomat said Friday.

“I believe being a member of the Security Council itself will bolster deterrence against North Korea (DPRK), now that we can directly discuss its provocations at the council,” foreign minister Kim Sung-hwan told a press briefing.

“This will allow us to contribute to regional peace and world peace as well,” he said, adding the country will “play a leading role” in resolving global conflicts.

South Korea’s presidential office Cheong Wa Dae echoed the sentiment, saying in a statement that the country will “solidify peace on the Korean peninsula” and help “maintain global peace and stability.”

The remarks came a day after South Korea was elected to the 15- nation United Nations Security Council, along with Australia, Rwanda, Argentina and Luxembourg, for the first time in 15 years.

It won 149 votes in the second round of voting, more than the 129 votes necessary to win a seat on the council, beating Bhutan and Cambodia that also eyed the Asia-Pacific seat.

South Korea, which joined the U.N. in 1991 along with the DPRK, will serve on the council for the next two years alongside the five veto-holding permanent council members.

설정

트랙백

댓글

Eric Topol: Nanosensors in Blood Warn of Heart Attack from WIRED on FORA.tv

 

이것은 첫 2분간의 동영상입니다. 전체를 보시려면 우측하단의 "Watch FULL program"을 클릭^^

 

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

Craig Venter: At the Final Frontier of Synthetic Biology from WIRED on FORA.tv

 

이것은 프로그램의 앞부분 10분간의 동영상입니다. 전체 프로그램을 다 보시려면 우측하단의 "Watch FULL program"을 클릭하세요^^

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

 

On Thursday, CNN Student News journeys to the Pakistani region where a 14-year-old education activist was attacked by the Taliban, and we hear from one of her classmates who was also wounded in the shooting. We also report on a planetary discovery, a split between Lance Armstrong and Livestrong, and what could soon be the fastest road in America. Plus, we get your wheels spinning with a report on a cardboard bike.

설정

트랙백

댓글

미국대선후보 제2차 토론 동영상(98분)

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글

Why Obama Lost 2012 Debate: Doesn't Like Confrontation from The New Yorker on FORA.tv

 

 

이것은 프로그램의 앞부분 10분간의 동영상입니다.

전체 프로그램을 다 보시려면 우측하단의 "Watch FULL program"을 클릭하세요^^

설정

트랙백

댓글

설정

트랙백

댓글